.
Feedback

Gloria Steinem & That Pesky 'F' Word

Feminism: Still crazy after all these years.

I am now and always have been a member of the Feminist party. That’s not to say I don’t like men. Some of my best friends are men, even my husband, and I don’t make this pronouncement to be arrogant or “uppity.” It’s just who I am, so it warmed my heart and brought a smile to my face to see Gloria Steinem back in the news. 

At 77 she’s looking fine and still fighting the good fight … keeping that “F” word alive.  Having her up front and center again brings back memories of a different time … a time, not so long ago, when working women lived in a Mad Men world of glass ceilings and “Where’s my coffee?” My single mom was a “Peggy” in that very same Madison Ave. ad world. 

Gloria helped change that world. More women are CEOs, doctors, lawyers, even Indian chiefs. But as she keeps pointing out, not all things regarding a woman’s “place” in American society have changed and recently cited two examples: women are still paid less than men for the same job and women are still the main child-rearers and housekeepers. As she continues to throw down the feminist gauntlet, she reminded me of one afternoon not that long ago at the Studio City gym, “For Women Only.”

I was on the treadmill (the fitness kind, not the one we’re on every day), doing my own iPod shuffle and leafing through the latest issue of People magazine when a young woman I knew jumped onto the adjoining treadmill. She’s one of those women who, when asked “Hi, how are you?” actually tells you—non-stop. As she warmed up by walking faster than I run at top speed, I recklessly opened the floodgates by saying: “Hi, how are you?”

Instantly, she plunged into her own private 10K run, as she relayed her incredible story of survival in a corporate world of sexual harassment and gender backbiting (without the slightest strain in her breathing, thank you very much), and how she was ready to forge headlong into the future and fight for her rightful place in the world. 

A half-hour later she finished. I was awestruck. In tribute to all she had overcome and all she planned to do, I called her a true feminist, naively assuming she would take it as the compliment I meant it to be. Instead, she nearly leaped off the treadmill and snapped: I’M NOT A FEMINIST!”

I was so stunned by her reaction, I started jogging.

As my shock wore off and I returned to my more reasonable pace, I asked her why. Her answer was simple: “I don’t want to alienate anybody.” 

For the second time in my life, mere moments apart, I had an overwhelming urge to become a sprinter. I couldn’t believe what she was saying! After all the progress she had made, she was ready to give it all back! I mean, really, alienating whom?! The people who didn’t want to hire, promote or pay her equally because she had “X” chromosomes? Not likely.

So what was it about that word that triggered such a response … that makes too many of us women cringe when we’re accused of being one, as if it were the ultimate insult? Why has “feminism” become another “F” word? It’s easy to blame the mostly male media’s years of portraying feminists as bossy, man-hating mantises that fueled a growing backlash against women who kept moving up the corporate ranks. But, maybe, just maybe, in our “take no prisoners” march for equality all those years ago, some of us forgot our common sense and lost our sense of humor.

Before I married, I dated a guy I cared about, but he wasn’t willing to make a commitment. He insisted on the option of dating other women. Saturday nights were mine, but the rest of the week was open to interpretation. I was young and foolish, so I agreed. After dating about six months, he inquired why he always paid for our theater tickets, dinners, whatever. As a self-proclaimed “feminist,” didn’t I want to pay my fair share? I told him no (I was a feminist, not foolish), and explained that feminism had nothing to do with who paid for dinner. Why should I pick up a tab for someone who wanted to use the money he saved on me to wine and dine the first bimbo who said yes to Tuesday? Made sense to me. OK, maybe she wasn’t a bimbo, but you get the point.

I really couldn’t blame him—we had confused the poor guy, and ultimately alienated ourselves, with all that 50/50 rhetoric. Nothing in life is 50/50 except a coin toss.

Maybe it was time to soften our image, put a new spin on things and put the “feminine” back into feminist. No, I’m not talking crinolines and ruffles (though black lace garters have their uses), but if a man wants to open a door for us, hey, why strain? And, if some swain (don’t you just love that word?) wants to lay his coat over a puddle so your feet stay dry, smile first ... then step on it!

Since the day of my treadmill epiphany, my “no frills” gym has changed. For Women Only was sold and became “.” Clearly, this is not your mothers’ gym. It’s been modernized for today’s Studio City woman and offers heavy duty workouts in boxing, pilates, aerobics and even pole fitness (the politically correct way to say pole dancing.) Hey, don’t knock it, it’s a great workout and those black lace garters might come in handy.

The “Wonder Woman” graphics on the gym’s website are bolder and more colorful and the women in the photos promote muscles, physical strength, and empowerment, all dressed in hip (and feminine) workout clothes. 21st century women might not call themselves feminists, but it seems they’re not going to let anyone take anything away from them, and isn’t that what feminism is all about?

Thanks, Gloria!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Studio City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Barbara Krause May 21, 2013 at 07:58 pm
Oh, it was under announcements and not opinion so that is why I did not understand the post whichRead More appeared as facts.
John Walker May 21, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Presumptuous? What about my "endorsement" is presumptuous. You don't really need toRead More respond😃, I just didn't understand the comment.
Barbara Krause May 21, 2013 at 09:06 am
Somewhat presumptuous this early on Voting Day.
David Pearlberg December 21, 2012 at 11:00 pm
I attended N.H.H.S. in the mid-seventies. Mr. Reeves and Mr. Moelter were two of my favorites.Read More Loved Mr. McLeroy for Sociology.
Kim Phillips-Clark December 19, 2012 at 07:25 pm
great article Mary! Ms. Korney, she sometimes scared me to death! But always around christmas IRead More think of her and pronounce my letters clearly at the end of a word when I sing. I can still remember the song I had to sing for my final, "If ever I would leave you..." She taught me a lot. I agree with everything you said about Mr. Reeves. I had Mr. Pesin for Algebra, he did nothing to help further my math skills. The biggest flirt around, ick. We had a girl in school at the time that flirted her way to an A and hardly ever went to class. Go figure!! I also thought quite highly of Ms. Requiam. Glad she's still around.
Mary McGrath December 18, 2012 at 07:59 pm
Oh, that's so funny Suzanne....what a great story!
Miki Henderson April 27, 2013 at 02:27 pm
Is there a video of this minecraft from mr donovan
Rich Addams March 30, 2013 at 02:49 pm
Luv the bunnyleggos
Cheyenne Chasen March 25, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Love seeing the new entries each and every week! Keep it up!
Alex Daniels May 22, 2013 at 12:18 am
glad you lost Wendy...not even your mafia DWP bedfellows could push you through..now go away...
Alex Daniels May 21, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I also notice Wendy Gruel has no platform, except taking money from special interest (most notablyRead More her puppet masters at the DWP) and having one of the most negative campaigns I've ever seen......no thanks, negative Wendy, fool me once.....Eric is our next Mayor....
Jo Perry May 20, 2013 at 08:27 pm
The signs are everywhere! Please vote for Wendy, Nora. He is also running ads about Wendy GreuelRead More that he knows are outright lies.
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 02:21 pm
She has received a lot of flak about making a premature decision...I hope someone from OvarianRead More Cancer or the community weighs in on this and gives their thoughts in a blog! Thanks...just click the START BLOGGING button below! THANKS!
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 09:34 am
It's better if you put this in the START A BLOG area and add photos...it stays there longer!
A. May 18, 2013 at 01:37 pm
ok. have now spent some time navigating the new patch. i hope everyone will give it a chance. it'sRead More growing on me. i think once everyone is more familiar with the new version they'll like it too.
Irene DeBlasio May 17, 2013 at 04:09 pm
@MikeSzymanski I must admit that I haven't been able to detect a new format. Where is the format?Read More Who designed this? All I can tell is that there is a beautiful shot of trees -- perfect! Under that banner all hell breaks lose and you can't tell what you're looking it. There might be a huge blowup of Mr. Walker or a too big notice of something official-looking -- possibly an agenda. I have not been able to navigate through all the stuff. Lots of white space on either side which gives me impression that we're tailoring a community paper more toward an iphone or smart phone (or a tablet). Maybe I need a GPS to find a good list of contents here. In the meantime, it's not very attractive (exception for the banner trees photo) nor entertaining and not very informative. Scotty Reston, where are you now that we need you?
A. May 16, 2013 at 10:19 pm
the picture selected is nice and it well suits the page. it would be nice to see the full pic. tooRead More bad so much of it is blocked from the top portion of the content....any chance of seeing the full picture and starting the content beneath it?
Barbara Krause May 17, 2013 at 08:00 am
I find this very disconcerting. Mel Randall who is on the Land Use Committee was asked to submit hisRead More name. We assumed qualifications would be checked and then those best suited would be chosen. Two entries of the same name is in itself so bad makes me feel that all of this should be redone.
Hugh May 16, 2013 at 07:50 am
I was at the meeting last night and saw all I need to see on how our neighborhood council work. TheyRead More had a drawing for the grievance panel. WHAT A SHAM!! They drew 1 guys name twice and rather than stop the proceedings and make sure that the names in the hat were legitimate and no other duplicates exist and redo the drawing, they just drew another name. Now it probably was just a fluke but the appearance of a rigged drawing is there and it taints the whole council and it proceedings. It is very apparent why we need a grievance panel in the first place. When the appearance of corruption exists at the lowest levels of our democratic process it is no wonder that the whole system is collapsing before our eyes. Our neighborhood council should hang their heads in shame!