.
Feedback

Opinion: The Truth About Co-Location

Local parents recently learned a charter school is slated to move on to the Micheltorena campus next fall. Allison Bajracharya, Managing Regional Director, Los Angeles California Charter Schools Association, explains how the co-location works.

Charter schools and charter affiliates are a complex system of educational alternatives to public schools and private schools. The quasi-form of system allowing parent and adminstrative autonomy exists somewhat locally at  and Colfax Charter which are still connected to LAUSD. But, there is a danger that some public schools, if they don't have enough spaces to fill the classrooms, can be taken over by charter schools. Here is some information.

 

**************

We still have a lot of work to do in Los Angeles to improve our public schools and make sure that every student receives a great education. Unfortunately, there has also been a lot of misinformation about charter schools and co-locations put out there recently, so I wanted to share some more information to help parents and community members understand this issue.

Since 1993, charter schools have been a part of public education in Los Angeles, growing in response to demand from parents. In fact, currently, there are over 10,000 students on charter school wait lists in Los Angeles.

However, one major challenge that charter schools face is finding school facilities. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of charter schools that are co-located at traditional campuses in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), which means two public schools sharing the same campus. For instance, the charter school uses a set of classrooms or portables and shares common spaces like the cafeteria and playing fields.

There are currently about 50 co-locations in LAUSD, including some sites where charter schools and district schools work together collaboratively and have a positive relationship. Positive co-locations are generally a result of community support and respect for multiple public school options and school leaders’ asset-oriented mindset around opportunities for collaboration, partnership or simply put, mutually respectful co-habitation.

Charter schools are public schools!

Charter schools are tuition-free, public schools that are open to all students. There are currently 210 charter schools operating within the boundaries of LAUSD, serving more than 80,000 students.

Unlike district public schools, charter schools are not automatically provided facilities.

Instead, they must either request facilities from the local school district or search and pay for a private facility,  often at market rates. The California law Proposition 39 requires school districts to make "reasonably equivalent" facilities available to charter schools, and charter schools reimburse the district for their proportionate share of the district’s facilities costs. The principle behind Prop. 39 is very simple – charter school students are public school students and deserve to have access to safe, quality public school facilities in which to learn, just like other public school students.

Charter schools usually do not ask for co-locations.

Charter schools want what any school wants – a permanent home with plenty of space for their students to learn and play. In the fall, they submit a request for facilities to their local school district, which includes, among other things, their attendance projections and a description of the neighborhood where they want to locate. On Feb. 1, the district sends a preliminary offer to schools, proposing facilities for the charter school’s use. In LAUSD, these have generally been offers of co-locations.

The charter school has until March 1 to respond to this proposal with any concerns, and the school may make counter-proposals for different facilities. Charter schools must request facilities each year, unless the district offers multi-year arrangements to the schools. Many districts offer multi-year arrangements in which entire campuses or administrative facilities are allocated to one or more charter schools.  Districts and charter schools can also enter into alternative agreements regarding facilities or funding in-lieu of facilities.

This is not and should not be about “Us vs. Them.” It’s about our kids.

We all agree that all public school students deserve adequate, safe school space to learn and play. Charter schools are an integral part of public school options that are working in Los Angeles.  In order to ensure that all students have access to high quality options, it is critical that the entire community embrace reforms that are working—and not pit one against the other.  

Find out more about Prop. 39 and how it impact students:http://www.calcharters.org/2010/09/about-proposition-39.html

About the California Charter Schools Association 
The California Charter Schools Association is the membership and professional organization serving 982 charter public schools and over 412,000 students in the state of California. The Vision of the California Charter Schools Association is to usher in a new era in public education so all students attend independent, innovative, accountable schools of choice. Learn more about charter schools at www.calcharters.org.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Studio City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Walker May 21, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Presumptuous? What about my "endorsement" is presumptuous. You don't really need toRead More respond😃, I just didn't understand the comment.
Barbara Krause May 21, 2013 at 09:06 am
Somewhat presumptuous this early on Voting Day.
David Pearlberg December 21, 2012 at 11:00 pm
I attended N.H.H.S. in the mid-seventies. Mr. Reeves and Mr. Moelter were two of my favorites.Read More Loved Mr. McLeroy for Sociology.
Kim Phillips-Clark December 19, 2012 at 07:25 pm
great article Mary! Ms. Korney, she sometimes scared me to death! But always around christmas IRead More think of her and pronounce my letters clearly at the end of a word when I sing. I can still remember the song I had to sing for my final, "If ever I would leave you..." She taught me a lot. I agree with everything you said about Mr. Reeves. I had Mr. Pesin for Algebra, he did nothing to help further my math skills. The biggest flirt around, ick. We had a girl in school at the time that flirted her way to an A and hardly ever went to class. Go figure!! I also thought quite highly of Ms. Requiam. Glad she's still around.
Mary McGrath December 18, 2012 at 07:59 pm
Oh, that's so funny Suzanne....what a great story!
Miki Henderson April 27, 2013 at 02:27 pm
Is there a video of this minecraft from mr donovan
Rich Addams March 30, 2013 at 02:49 pm
Luv the bunnyleggos
Cheyenne Chasen March 25, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Love seeing the new entries each and every week! Keep it up!
Jo Perry May 20, 2013 at 08:27 pm
The signs are everywhere! Please vote for Wendy, Nora. He is also running ads about Wendy GreuelRead More that he knows are outright lies.
Nora Doyle May 20, 2013 at 06:31 pm
It really ticked me off to see those signs cluttering up our public spaces. I'm still undecided whoRead More to vote for, and I emailed his campaign to tell them that is is just the kind of thing that would prevent me from voting for him unless the signs disappeared by election day. I'm glad I'm not the only one to email them about it.
Jo Perry May 20, 2013 at 05:51 pm
Wendy Greuel was incredibly efficient and responsive when she represented our district. I'm sorry,Read More Leah, that your concerns were not answered. I know she worked closely with the SCRA to improve Studio City. She will will be the same way as Mayor! Vote Wendy Greuel.
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 02:21 pm
She has received a lot of flak about making a premature decision...I hope someone from OvarianRead More Cancer or the community weighs in on this and gives their thoughts in a blog! Thanks...just click the START BLOGGING button below! THANKS!
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 09:34 am
It's better if you put this in the START A BLOG area and add photos...it stays there longer!
A. May 18, 2013 at 01:37 pm
ok. have now spent some time navigating the new patch. i hope everyone will give it a chance. it'sRead More growing on me. i think once everyone is more familiar with the new version they'll like it too.
Irene DeBlasio May 17, 2013 at 04:09 pm
@MikeSzymanski I must admit that I haven't been able to detect a new format. Where is the format?Read More Who designed this? All I can tell is that there is a beautiful shot of trees -- perfect! Under that banner all hell breaks lose and you can't tell what you're looking it. There might be a huge blowup of Mr. Walker or a too big notice of something official-looking -- possibly an agenda. I have not been able to navigate through all the stuff. Lots of white space on either side which gives me impression that we're tailoring a community paper more toward an iphone or smart phone (or a tablet). Maybe I need a GPS to find a good list of contents here. In the meantime, it's not very attractive (exception for the banner trees photo) nor entertaining and not very informative. Scotty Reston, where are you now that we need you?
A. May 16, 2013 at 10:19 pm
the picture selected is nice and it well suits the page. it would be nice to see the full pic. tooRead More bad so much of it is blocked from the top portion of the content....any chance of seeing the full picture and starting the content beneath it?
Barbara Krause May 17, 2013 at 08:00 am
I find this very disconcerting. Mel Randall who is on the Land Use Committee was asked to submit hisRead More name. We assumed qualifications would be checked and then those best suited would be chosen. Two entries of the same name is in itself so bad makes me feel that all of this should be redone.
Hugh May 16, 2013 at 07:50 am
I was at the meeting last night and saw all I need to see on how our neighborhood council work. TheyRead More had a drawing for the grievance panel. WHAT A SHAM!! They drew 1 guys name twice and rather than stop the proceedings and make sure that the names in the hat were legitimate and no other duplicates exist and redo the drawing, they just drew another name. Now it probably was just a fluke but the appearance of a rigged drawing is there and it taints the whole council and it proceedings. It is very apparent why we need a grievance panel in the first place. When the appearance of corruption exists at the lowest levels of our democratic process it is no wonder that the whole system is collapsing before our eyes. Our neighborhood council should hang their heads in shame!