.
Feedback

THE EVER-CHANGING 'HOOD: The McMansion-ification of Studio City

Taking a bath is the last thing I thought I had to worry about when construction started on a new house next door.

(EDITOR'S NOTE: I'm delighted to introduce Ilona Saari's new column to Studio City Patch that will be a regular feature on Saturdays. You can also find Ilona's blog posts in in the Local Voices. Enjoy!)

 

I don’t know about you, but my Playboy centerfold days are over.  Even sitting seductively in a bubble bath with one leg strategically draped over the edge of the tub is no longer one of my best looks.

So, needless to say, when a bunch of strangers (well, two) find me this way, I’m not a happy camper. But first a little back story:

Remember when those charming California one-story bungalows and craftsman houses in Santa Monica on those tony, tree-lined streets between Montana and San Vicente were bought as "tear-downs," and huge two-story homes (some tasteful, some garish) were built on bungalow-size lots dwarfing the land and the original smaller houses that remained?

Well, now it’s happening in our ‘hood. I call it McMansion-ification… a derivative of gentrification, and whether we like it or not, our neighborhood is being McMansion-ized before our very eyes.

It started on my street a couple of years ago when a neighbor sold his house to a "speculator" who built a 5,500 square foot, two-story, “Mediterranean” McMansion. Right across the street! Right in front of my office window! Nightly I prayed to Gilda, the Goddess of Good Taste that the front lawn would not be adorned with fountains and naked statues.  

Please, no knock-off Davids or armless Venuses! Thankfully, there aren’t… they’re in the backyard (I kid you not).  I use the term “back yard” loosely, since there is no back yard, just a pool and a narrow cement surround with statues. “Pool yard?”

Putting aside the very poor workmanship of this McMansion, it was listed for more than double the value of any house on our street. That was more than two years ago. It hasn’t sold. Rented, yes. Sold, no.  And, now, this overblown, overdone house is empty again. They say it takes a village—well, a village is what it would take to fill that house.

The fact that this house hasn’t sold, however, hasn’t deterred other speculators. Nope. A new McMansion is being built on my block. Right now. Right next door. Right on top of me and my 1941 one-story California “bungalow.” 

Every morning, 7 a.m. sharp, the banging starts, the truck, back-up beeping noise begins, jackhammers jack, steam shovels shake, our windows rattle, and lumber trucks roll as construction workers (and their cars) take over our street.

So what does all this have to do with bubble baths? I love them. I love to soak in my wonderful vintage claw-foot soaking tub. Now, did I mention that this construction going on is not more than 10 feet from my bathroom window which sits very nicely over my wonderful vintage claw-foot soaking tub? And since it is, when I want to soak in bubbles, I’m forced to time this meditative, relaxing experience to the construction workers schedule… their lunch break, or when they’re working on the first floor or in the front of the building. 

Did I mention that I have no window treatment on that window over the bathtub?  Didn’t need it because the house next door used to be only one story… and we had a nice fence… and I didn’t want to block out my sunlight.

So, after checking the whereabouts of the workers the other morning (they were all working on the front façade of the building), I drew my bath, got the latest mystery I was reading and sunk deep into the hot, bubble-bath-y water. Heaven. All my aches, pains and woes were melting away—that is, until I heard loud voices overhead. 

I looked up and there above me hanging over the ledge of the McMansion second story frame were two workmen hauling something up with a rope. I put my book down and sunk deeper into the tub and under the bubbles. Should I wave and pretend this is an everyday occurrence? Should I pretend I don’t see them? They seem to be pretending not to see me.

Should I nonchalantly stand up and get out of the tub? Have you ever tried to nonchalantly lift yourself out of a deep claw-foot tub?  Not a graceful thing (even for an ex-dancer). On the off-chance they didn’t see me, I was afraid to move (remember, being naked in a bubble bath is not a look that I would tweet to anyone)… I felt like a hiker confronted by a bear in the woods. Should I freeze  Roll over? Play dead? Drown myself?

The workers weren’t leaving and my bubble bath reverie was long gone—my water was rapidly fading from blissfully warm to unappealingly tepid – I needed to get out. A light bulb went off in my head.  I reached for my plush, white bath towel and wrapped it around me—yup, in the water, and trickily held it together with one arm while I clumsily lifted myself up and out of the tub and out of the workers’ sight with my other arm. 

Did they watch me struggle to maintain my naked dignity? Well, let’s put it this way—I didn’t hear any applause, but I will always be grateful for bubbles and towels.

So, on this note—a note to all: When McMansion-ification comes to your street… go shopping for shades or take your bubble bath at midnight.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Studio City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

MickMil August 14, 2011 at 01:19 am
Interesting personal perspective. I have seen this going on all over town. Better buy a bigger bath towel!
Scott Ouellette August 14, 2011 at 12:45 pm
Everyone wants to talk about the bad examples of homes, what about the good examples of large homes. There is an RFA in the works from the council office which only allows for smaller home unless owner incorporate design bonuses which allow homes up to a .53 FAR (Floor Area Ration) vs. a .6 FAR under the baseline mansionization ordinance. The FAR will add character to larger homes and help to reduce building massing.
The other side of the mansion issue is property rights, not yours, your neighbor's. Anyone can build a two-story home and none of us can stop that. If you value the open space above your neighbor's home then go buy it from your neighbor. You can purchase air rights. Have you every watched the movie Burlesque? I can't have what's not yours unless you're willing to pay for it. Property rights are valuable, and in this economy, who wants to give them away?
Dick Carter August 14, 2011 at 01:22 pm
How about that pathetic thing built at the end of Whitsett, south of the boulevard, that looks so dreadful, as to almost be comical in its bad taste.
Ilona Saari August 14, 2011 at 01:28 pm
You mean the one up on the hill facing Whitsett w/ all the truly hideous stone? If that's the one you're taking about - that truly is one ugly house. IMO, of course. ;o)
Leah August 14, 2011 at 03:09 pm
What I don't understand is why buyers with children buy these homes with NO backyard for their children to play safely in.
Also, have you noticed how some of these new homeowners park every single vehicle (like 3 or 4) in the huge driveways that are the focal point of the new homes and never use their garages? These new homes have provided a parking lot feel to our neighborhood too. Guess they don't care about having their vehicles broken into or stolen....guess they are just lazy. This is the number one crime in our area and a reminder to everyone. That is why we have garages.
JESSYCA NYGREN August 14, 2011 at 05:30 pm
This is AMERICA ... people actually have rights & freedoms... for better & for worse.
Dick Carter August 15, 2011 at 02:42 pm
could be no other!
Must have gotten a deal on flagstone, you think!
Skraeling August 15, 2011 at 04:56 pm
That office has repeatedly been a hindrance to any but developers and money players...no help there for anything positive in Studio City...sorry
Skraeling August 15, 2011 at 05:00 pm
and residents of an area should also have rights as to how that area should should look, that is one reason many choose to buy or live there. As for ugly homes, now that the Colfax bridge is open, it is easy to see the ugliest house I have seen in Studio City in years...A huge monstrosity, ugly, corner property of about 13,000 ft of 2 story stucco and absolutely revolting design.....How did this guy get a permit? Truly an eyesore, and badly in need of maintenance.
Ilona Saari August 15, 2011 at 05:05 pm
Dick - no matter how cheap the flagstone - the builder paid too much. ;o) And ditto on that front door. ;o)
Ilona Saari August 15, 2011 at 05:05 pm
Free would have been too much. <g>
LA Momma August 15, 2011 at 08:56 pm
You had to know it would come to this. It started out with the SUV/Van/PickUp craze - really, do you need a 3 ton car to transport 2 kids? And before that, a pool in every backyard? So I'm not shocked that with the big cars come the big houses. That said, there are great designs out there - big, yes, but great. To each their own "American" dream.
LA Momma August 15, 2011 at 08:57 pm
So funny !
Ilona Saari August 15, 2011 at 09:09 pm
LOL - I've always been a bit confused by Hummer owners - why does anyone need a tank in Los Angeles - but I'm not crazed over SUVs (well, most of them anyway) - I have a hybrid SUV -- that said, when Studio City was first built in the 40's - it was to entice people to move to the Valley by offering them 2-3 bedroom bungalows, w/ a lemon or orange tree (or both) and a pool. I live in a 1941 darling 'bungalow' w/ a pool from the same era even tho it's been resurfaced a couple of times over the decades... I have to admit that the McMansion being built right next door has a clapboard, Cape Cod vibe - unlike the more garish McMansion across the street that hasn't sold in over 4-5 years
Judith Vogelsang August 16, 2011 at 03:59 am
Fun article. Sorry to hear about the McMansionification of Studio City however.
LA Momma August 16, 2011 at 11:29 am
I also wonder why anyone would spend so much money to build one of those McMansions only to have the view of someone else's backyard, garage or house roof top. I love our old Valley homes with original pools and the trees, I didn't know that was the rule. We still have two very old orange trees that yield a huge crop year-round.
Richard Camp August 16, 2011 at 11:45 am
@LA Momma... yep, we moved into our house in 1991... with an orange tree and two lemon trees in the back yard... In twenty years we've never had to buy citrus at the markets!
Ilona Saari August 16, 2011 at 12:19 pm
It wasn't a rule - but it was the plan of the original builders of homes in our 'hood "back in the day" to entice families to move to the Valley...
Nina Malone August 17, 2011 at 03:32 am
very funny despite all the venting it produced.
Ilona Saari August 17, 2011 at 01:04 pm
LOL - thanx, Nina. It was a funny situation in an SNL sort of way. ;o)
Leah August 17, 2011 at 08:11 pm
I just added a pix of the 2 houses going up on Hillslope from a neighbor's yard that is 4 HOUSES AWAY!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you OFER RUBIN, owner of North Hollywood Marble who insisted on cutting down the 40 ft tall trees and wants to take out the trees or cut into Daniel's property..because, god forbid, it will take away the extra inches and then he would have to maybe cut the size of the house back by 4 sq. ft! and to Eli Bahar and Yehuda Dehrey for all banning together to destroy our neighborhood. Please don't sell to these people or their "investors" anymore...IIona will never be able to take a bath again!
LA Momma August 17, 2011 at 08:18 pm
Aagghh! There is something wrong with our zoning laws when we can't build within x feet of our (unused) garages or have to have x feet between our water meter and the driveway but a developer can build up, up, and away !!
Leah August 17, 2011 at 08:46 pm
AND to top it off...they raised the land 2 ft...so they even tower MORE. Think of the poor people living next and behind!
Yes Jessyca...it is America but does one have to build so BIG???
Ilona Saari August 17, 2011 at 09:20 pm
ICAM, LA Momma - the lack of zoning laws (actually the lack of enforcing zoning laws) is outrageous. I do think there's a lot of money is being spent to get past whatever laws there are... I hope that as we rue what's happening to our 'hood - at least my bath story made you laugh...
CB White August 29, 2011 at 06:11 pm
Usually, the property owner and the city have a public meeting where the community can come together to voice their opinion.
I received a notice as such when they split a double lot into 2, building a MCMansion on one, and the other is an overgrown weedy mess, which supposedly they were going to build another home the year after. I called each and every neighbor I had, and even offered to drive them to the hearing with me. Not a single person who confirmed came.I was the only voice of opposition. Then, all of my neighbors complained this house was being built. I made a point of reminding them that I had called them before hand, and told them about the public hearing. That said, I was a little smug, and told them that our neighborhood is exactly, that, OUR neighborhood. If you want to see change, you must show up in numbers.. The fellow who bought the property has since sold it to a friend, and luckily, the people who own it now, have relatives renting from them- a very nice family, who do not wish to have another house built on the second lot. So, it's a small victory, but it does take a community! Enjoy those bubble baths, and great article!
Leah August 29, 2011 at 08:23 pm
WOW CB...What neighborhood do you live in?? There is no public meeting...most of the time we don't even know the house has been sold. And before you know it, as soon as escrow closes ( I mean the exact minute..at least it seems like) the city comes to verify the address to demolish. Trust me...IF there was a public meeting and anyone of the neighbors on Cantura or Hillslope knew about it...they WOULD definitely have gone.
These people lie about who buys the house, who the builder is and always give the same story. They are sneaky and underhanded and don't care about anything except to build BIG homes in quaint neighborhoods. They are all connected in some way. We do have a community that has been fighting this for 6 years, ever since Wendy Greuel was the council person.
CB White August 29, 2011 at 08:53 pm
I live in the "poor" part of Sherman oaks, the part that was annexed from Van Nuys! lol.
I remember it very well, that there were flyers posted about the hearing- perhaps it was because the double lot was divided, that was why they notified us? In the flyer, the information was listed that two 2 story houses were going to be built, and luckily, only one has been built. The neighbors on the side of the MCMansion were pretty upset! Still are- they even considered selling their home, but reconsidered once their child was on the way.
Skraeling August 29, 2011 at 10:52 pm
Wendy Gruel has a following that denies her close relationship with developers and builders, and her successor krikorian is following in her footsteps. But, the giant problem here, and in LA generally, is the apathy of the vast majority. Don't forget, we live in a city where less than 23% of eligible voters bothered to show up at the polls....the road to corruption is wide open.
Mary McGrath September 28, 2011 at 11:29 am
What a charming article! I live in a condo, so don't have to deal with this, but nearby in Westchester, there have been many smaller homes that have been super-sized to dwarf neighboring homes. And sadly, these homes are hard to sell....
Leah October 5, 2011 at 07:11 pm
Accord Struck to Limit Mansionization in Studio City Mansionization
STUDIO CITY - In 2008, as residents throughout Los Angeles sought to contain what many called the scourge of large homes on small lots, the city enacted a set of regulations to curb mansionization. Under the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance, a home on a 6,750-square-foot lot (the typical lot size in Studio City) is limited to 4,050 square feet. Previous zoning codes allowed more than twice that mass, with a 7,000-square-foot limit. The ordinance, which applies to 300,000 properties in single-family residential zones throughout Los Angeles, also allowed communities to write their own ordinances to limit mansionization. Recently, Studio City did just with a new ordinance that could soon be approved by the city called the Residential Floor Area (RFA) District. The RFA, agreed on recently after dozens of meetings with hundreds of residents, went further than the city's ordinance to limit mansionization - the phenomenon of tearing down an existing home and replacing it with one that may be much larger than surrounding homes. By controlling mansionization for nearly 4,000 Studio City homes - limiting lots of 6,750 square feet to 3,578 square feet - residents in the East Valley essentially agreed to the widest ranging set of guidelines a community has ever enacted to maintain the integrity of their neighborhood.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike Szymanski (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 10:43 pm
You might want to consider posting this as a blog, so it appears like an article in the NEWS areaRead More http://studiocity.patch.com/blogs/new
Mike Szymanski (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 09:54 am
Hey Beth! You may want to consider posting photos in a gallery by using the START BLOGGING buttonRead More on the front page for more visibility on the site! thanks!
at the wheel
Mike Szymanski (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 09:57 am
My sister just did a first-time experience...stay tuned to her post of what she did with her friendsRead More going there a few weeks ago...she loved it! Post your thoughts here, or consider clicking the START BLOGGING button on the bottom left of the front page to tell us more and start a conversation!
mzjuniper June 19, 2013 at 07:27 am
I celebrated my husbands birthday here with a bunch of friends. The 6 of us sat around the wheelRead More learning to spin pottery. It was so much fun! And we got to all try something new together. The teacher is very patient and helpful. It was a truly delightful experience. I highly recommend it.
Stepping back into the light. Thanks Jaqueline Huang.
E.M. Fredric June 16, 2013 at 08:56 pm
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rumradio-org/2013/06/17/rumradio-interview-with-eva-marie-fredric-1
E.M. Fredric June 16, 2013 at 08:56 pm
Thanks Mike, you are always such a positive and supportive friend!
E.M. Fredric June 17, 2013 at 10:00 am
The re-airs tonight and Sunday on the radio but you can listen at the link above any time.
Rich Addams June 15, 2013 at 07:43 am
Who ARE you and what's the number? What kind of informational specialist are you, you leave noRead More number, no email, and you expect us to care? BLOG something lady! Tells us about it!!!!
Kalil Stimpson June 17, 2013 at 07:32 pm
Dear tbs, Deon Coles black box is the worst tv show ever. Though it is hosted by a black man, it'sRead More a show based on pointing fun and rude Racist jokes directed toward black people. If there was a white host it would be considered racist but because a black man was appointed to be host , you might have figured we wouldn't be offended but we are and I can't speak for all but I feel like resist jokes aren't ok regardless of who is telling them and I would like tbs to take down this show or atleast change the points in the show ! -signed, Kalil Stimpson
Miki Henderson June 12, 2013 at 11:29 am
How fun! I can't wait! What a great place to do it, too! Llove the cheeses!
Miki Henderson June 12, 2013 at 11:30 am
This is the last piece of open area along this river, if we're ever going to have it look like aRead More real river again, we MUST preserve this seciton, which is about a quarter way down! PLease help!! Thank you for your volunteerism, I know you ladies have done so much!