.
Feedback

Full Election Results, and 'Top 2' Outcomes

Sherman was the top vote-getter with Berman close behind.

Thanks to redistricting and the state's new "top two" election system, the high-profile battle between incumbent Democratic Reps. Brad Sherman and Howard Berman will carry on until November, when the two lawmakers will square off in a bid to represent a newly drawn 30th congressional district.

Sherman, D-Sherman Oaks, was the top vote-getter in Tuesday's election, with Berman, D-Van Nuys, close behind. The two big-name candidates were destined to square off in November before voting even began, thanks to the "top two" system that sends the top vote-getters to the runoff election regardless of political party.

"You are here at a victory party that is a preparation for a victory party in November," Sherman told supporters Tuesday night.

Sherman noted that Berman spent more money during the campaign, but said he would be stepping up his effort leading up to Nov. 6.

"We ran a bare-bones campaign in the primary," Sherman said. "That was the exhibition game. Now we're on to the real game and our team is ready to go."

Brandon Hall, a senior adviser to the Berman campaign, said momentum continued to build for Berman as the vote-counting continued.

"According to Brad Sherman's previously released internal polls, we have seized the momentum in this race," Hall said. "Early returns show that Congressman Berman has doubled his support from 17 percent to 34 percent. Sherman, on the other hand, hit his ceiling, stalling at 40 percent."

Hall said he was "confident about our momentum moving into the general election."

The election marked the first major test of the state's "top two" primary system, which was approved by California voters in 2010. The system does not apply to local, presidential or central committee races.

The system was intended to produce more moderate candidates, said Fernando Guerra, a Loyola Marymount politics professor and director of the Thomas and Dorothy Leavey Center for the Study of Los Angeles. But low turnout was the wild-card that could counteract that intention.

"Voters that are motivated by ideology are still going to dominate this election," Guerra said prior to the vote, adding that the "top two" runoff system is also likely to devastate third parties.

Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at USC, said the new system forces candidates to communicate more with voters.

"It's not just a quantity of voter communication. It's the nature of that communication as well," Schnur said. "Candidates will find that they can no longer rely solely on the most ideologically intense members of their own party. They will be forced to reach out to a broader range of voters."

The results of the every-10-year redistricting process also affected the makeup of candidates on today's ballot. The 2010-11 redistricting, the practice of redrawing political district boundaries to reflect changing demographics, was conducted by a non-partisan citizens commission, rather than lawmakers. In some cases the process forced incumbents of the same party into the same district -- such as Sherman and Berman.

In the South Bay, Democratic incumbents Laura Richardson and Janice Hahn were also forced to duke it out over the same district, and they too will square off in November.

 

 

Follow us on Twitter  | Like" us on  Facebook | Sign up for our daily Newsletter | Learn secrets of Studio City Patch here.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Studio City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Miki Henderson April 27, 2013 at 02:27 pm
Is there a video of this minecraft from mr donovan
Rich Addams March 30, 2013 at 02:49 pm
Luv the bunnyleggos
Cheyenne Chasen March 25, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Love seeing the new entries each and every week! Keep it up!
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 09:34 am
It's better if you put this in the START A BLOG area and add photos...it stays there longer!
A. May 18, 2013 at 01:37 pm
ok. have now spent some time navigating the new patch. i hope everyone will give it a chance. it'sRead More growing on me. i think once everyone is more familiar with the new version they'll like it too.
Irene DeBlasio May 17, 2013 at 04:09 pm
@MikeSzymanski I must admit that I haven't been able to detect a new format. Where is the format?Read More Who designed this? All I can tell is that there is a beautiful shot of trees -- perfect! Under that banner all hell breaks lose and you can't tell what you're looking it. There might be a huge blowup of Mr. Walker or a too big notice of something official-looking -- possibly an agenda. I have not been able to navigate through all the stuff. Lots of white space on either side which gives me impression that we're tailoring a community paper more toward an iphone or smart phone (or a tablet). Maybe I need a GPS to find a good list of contents here. In the meantime, it's not very attractive (exception for the banner trees photo) nor entertaining and not very informative. Scotty Reston, where are you now that we need you?
A. May 16, 2013 at 10:19 pm
the picture selected is nice and it well suits the page. it would be nice to see the full pic. tooRead More bad so much of it is blocked from the top portion of the content....any chance of seeing the full picture and starting the content beneath it?
Barbara Krause May 17, 2013 at 08:00 am
I find this very disconcerting. Mel Randall who is on the Land Use Committee was asked to submit hisRead More name. We assumed qualifications would be checked and then those best suited would be chosen. Two entries of the same name is in itself so bad makes me feel that all of this should be redone.
Hugh May 16, 2013 at 07:50 am
I was at the meeting last night and saw all I need to see on how our neighborhood council work. TheyRead More had a drawing for the grievance panel. WHAT A SHAM!! They drew 1 guys name twice and rather than stop the proceedings and make sure that the names in the hat were legitimate and no other duplicates exist and redo the drawing, they just drew another name. Now it probably was just a fluke but the appearance of a rigged drawing is there and it taints the whole council and it proceedings. It is very apparent why we need a grievance panel in the first place. When the appearance of corruption exists at the lowest levels of our democratic process it is no wonder that the whole system is collapsing before our eyes. Our neighborhood council should hang their heads in shame!
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Down on the bottom LEFT of the front page, StudioCity.Patch.com is the place to write comments aboutRead More WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE NEW PATCH? If you put in your email you will get a response!
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 01:39 pm
Yikes! The feedback box is gone! Send questions to help@patch.com they'll get back to you!
Sheri Haas May 16, 2013 at 01:25 pm
Don't see any box. The ads are the only items large and bright enough to read and they cover mostRead More everything.