.
Feedback

John Walker Discusses Universal Evolution Plan Change and Board Meeting

The Studio City Neighborhood Council president issued this letter and encourages the public to attend Wednesday night's meeting.

Find out about the Studio City Neighborhood Council and view the agenda by

 

The development of 2,937 apartments, condominiums and single family houses was part of a 20-year effort that would transform the 391-acre Universal Studios backlot with upgraded studios, a hotel and a revamped CityWalk shopping mall, among other features. Other aspects of the plan remain in place. While the original project was expected to cost $3 billion, NBCUniversal said its new proposed development would cost $1.6 billion.


The project, which has been reviewed by the Los Angeles Department of City Planning since 2006, still needs approval of its final environmental impact report. According to NBCUniversal, a "no residential" development alternative will be included as part of the final EIR in order to address comments from community stakeholders and elected officials. This is the version of the plan that NBCUniversal would pursue.

"After taking a hard look at the project, the current real estate market, our business needs and the needs of our surrounding communities, we believe it's best to ask the City and County to focus on our 20-year plan without any residential development and to retain our backlot for production," said Universal Studios President Ron Meyer in a statement.

The project, which is called the NBCUniversal Evolution Plan, was conceived during the boom years -- well before the recession wiped out demand for housing. The "no residential" development alternative would include about 200,000 square feet of additional studio square footage that the original plan did not feature.

In all, the new plan calls for 1.45 million square feet of studio space; 327,000 square feet of theme park attractions, retail and dining development; and two hotels. The final EIR has deemed the "no residential" plan to be the "environmentally superior" alternative, according to NBCUniversal. The company said that it would still invest the $100 million in transportation and traffic improvements that it had previously pledged.

"This is the right time in the process to make this decision and it will enable us to concentrate and invest in our core businesses -- television and film production, Universal Studios Hollywood Theme Park and CityWalk," Meyer said. "Planning for our future in a way that is responsive to the community has always been a priority of the Evolution Plan.  Today marks the next step in making this important project a reality."

Los Angeles County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky and Los Angeles City Councilmember Tom LaBonge, who represent the section of the San Fernando Valley that includes the project area, issued a joint statement that indicated their support for NBCUniversal dropping the residential component of the Evolution Plan. The prospective neighborhood would have been situation on the southeast section of the backlot, near Barham Boulevard.

"I have always opposed this kind of development on the NBCUniversal backlot," LaBonge said. "I want to see balanced development, and I support investments that would protect and upgrade the studio complex."

The final EIR could receive governmental approval by the middle of 2013; both the city and county must certify it. If the development were approved, NBCUniversal could break ground on the project shortly thereafter.

Opting for a smaller Evolution Plan development isn't the only big real estate decision NBCUniversal has made in recent months. In January, NBCUniversal pulled the plug on a planned 1.5 million-square-foot production and office project that would have been built atop a subway station on Lankershim Boulevard across from Universal Studios.

The two-phase development, which was to be called MetroStudios@Lankershim, would have cost $750 million and would have been built by downtown Los Angeles-based Thomas Properties Group, owner of downtown Los Angeles office properties City National Plaza and 800 South Hope. NBCUniversal would have occupied MetroStudios@Lankershim as the anchor tenant.

"In light of NBCU's changing requirements for office and post-production space, the planned MetroStudios@Lankershim project was not considered economically viable at this time," Thomas Properties stated in a Jan. 3 SEC filing.

 

SCNC BOARD MEETING, WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 6:30 PM - at CBS Studio Center Lot.

Please join us for our regularly scheduled Board meeting tomorrow evening.  I'm sure there will be comments on the (new) plan for the Universal project - we will also be hearing a presentation from Alan Dymond, the President of the SCRA on "Los Angeles River Natural Park" where the Weddington Golf Course is currently located.

We will be doing a Special Presentation honoring a member of our community, .

You will also be brought up to date regarding the .

Our buffet dinner and (mingling) conversation begins at 6:30 with our meeting to start at 7pm

Please attend.  Learn about your community and how you can get involved to preserve the beauty of Studio City.

Sincerely,

John Walker

President, SCNC

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Studio City Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Barbara Krause May 21, 2013 at 07:58 pm
Oh, it was under announcements and not opinion so that is why I did not understand the post whichRead More appeared as facts.
John Walker May 21, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Presumptuous? What about my "endorsement" is presumptuous. You don't really need toRead More respond😃, I just didn't understand the comment.
Barbara Krause May 21, 2013 at 09:06 am
Somewhat presumptuous this early on Voting Day.
David Pearlberg December 21, 2012 at 11:00 pm
I attended N.H.H.S. in the mid-seventies. Mr. Reeves and Mr. Moelter were two of my favorites.Read More Loved Mr. McLeroy for Sociology.
Kim Phillips-Clark December 19, 2012 at 07:25 pm
great article Mary! Ms. Korney, she sometimes scared me to death! But always around christmas IRead More think of her and pronounce my letters clearly at the end of a word when I sing. I can still remember the song I had to sing for my final, "If ever I would leave you..." She taught me a lot. I agree with everything you said about Mr. Reeves. I had Mr. Pesin for Algebra, he did nothing to help further my math skills. The biggest flirt around, ick. We had a girl in school at the time that flirted her way to an A and hardly ever went to class. Go figure!! I also thought quite highly of Ms. Requiam. Glad she's still around.
Mary McGrath December 18, 2012 at 07:59 pm
Oh, that's so funny Suzanne....what a great story!
Miki Henderson April 27, 2013 at 02:27 pm
Is there a video of this minecraft from mr donovan
Rich Addams March 30, 2013 at 02:49 pm
Luv the bunnyleggos
Cheyenne Chasen March 25, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Love seeing the new entries each and every week! Keep it up!
Alex Daniels May 22, 2013 at 12:18 am
glad you lost Wendy...not even your mafia DWP bedfellows could push you through..now go away...
Alex Daniels May 21, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I also notice Wendy Gruel has no platform, except taking money from special interest (most notablyRead More her puppet masters at the DWP) and having one of the most negative campaigns I've ever seen......no thanks, negative Wendy, fool me once.....Eric is our next Mayor....
Jo Perry May 20, 2013 at 08:27 pm
The signs are everywhere! Please vote for Wendy, Nora. He is also running ads about Wendy GreuelRead More that he knows are outright lies.
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 02:21 pm
She has received a lot of flak about making a premature decision...I hope someone from OvarianRead More Cancer or the community weighs in on this and gives their thoughts in a blog! Thanks...just click the START BLOGGING button below! THANKS!
Mike Szymanski (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 09:34 am
It's better if you put this in the START A BLOG area and add photos...it stays there longer!
A. May 18, 2013 at 01:37 pm
ok. have now spent some time navigating the new patch. i hope everyone will give it a chance. it'sRead More growing on me. i think once everyone is more familiar with the new version they'll like it too.
Irene DeBlasio May 17, 2013 at 04:09 pm
@MikeSzymanski I must admit that I haven't been able to detect a new format. Where is the format?Read More Who designed this? All I can tell is that there is a beautiful shot of trees -- perfect! Under that banner all hell breaks lose and you can't tell what you're looking it. There might be a huge blowup of Mr. Walker or a too big notice of something official-looking -- possibly an agenda. I have not been able to navigate through all the stuff. Lots of white space on either side which gives me impression that we're tailoring a community paper more toward an iphone or smart phone (or a tablet). Maybe I need a GPS to find a good list of contents here. In the meantime, it's not very attractive (exception for the banner trees photo) nor entertaining and not very informative. Scotty Reston, where are you now that we need you?
A. May 16, 2013 at 10:19 pm
the picture selected is nice and it well suits the page. it would be nice to see the full pic. tooRead More bad so much of it is blocked from the top portion of the content....any chance of seeing the full picture and starting the content beneath it?
Barbara Krause May 17, 2013 at 08:00 am
I find this very disconcerting. Mel Randall who is on the Land Use Committee was asked to submit hisRead More name. We assumed qualifications would be checked and then those best suited would be chosen. Two entries of the same name is in itself so bad makes me feel that all of this should be redone.
Hugh May 16, 2013 at 07:50 am
I was at the meeting last night and saw all I need to see on how our neighborhood council work. TheyRead More had a drawing for the grievance panel. WHAT A SHAM!! They drew 1 guys name twice and rather than stop the proceedings and make sure that the names in the hat were legitimate and no other duplicates exist and redo the drawing, they just drew another name. Now it probably was just a fluke but the appearance of a rigged drawing is there and it taints the whole council and it proceedings. It is very apparent why we need a grievance panel in the first place. When the appearance of corruption exists at the lowest levels of our democratic process it is no wonder that the whole system is collapsing before our eyes. Our neighborhood council should hang their heads in shame!